Search for: All records

ABSTRACT Collaboration and communication are important competencies for undergraduate life science education, as noted in theVision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Educationreport. However, initiating collaboration and communication in the classroom can be an anxiety-inducing experience for many students. In contrast to traditional-style icebreakers, we introduce a course content-focused icebreaker activity that served as a group-forming undertaking on the first day of class. We developed four sets of handouts (icebreaker tickets), each having a common course theme (e.g., microbiology, cell biology, physiological system infections/disorders, virology). Students were randomly provided with a ticket at the beginning of the course, and they worked to establish groups with their peers, based on their own interpretation of the ticket’s content and rationalization of a grouping scheme. Student feedback and engagement data collected from implementation at three independent institutions were largely positive, where students reported the activity to be an effective tool for building a course content-focused community of learners. The icebreaker tickets and instructor’s notes disseminated in this manuscript can be adapted to fit educators’ course goals and help set the tone for the first day of the class and beyond that fosters communication and collaboration among students. 

Immune literacy garnered significant attention in recent years due to the threat posed by emerging infectious diseases. The pace of immunological discoveries and their relevance to society are substantial yet coordinated educational efforts have been rare. This motivated us to create a task force of educators to reflect on pedagogical approaches to teaching immunology and to draft, develop, and evaluate key competencies for undergraduate immunology education. The research questions addressed include: 1) Which competencies are considered important by educators? 2) Are the illustrative skills clear, accurate and well aligned with the core competencies listed in theVision and Changereport?; 3) What are the concerns of immunology educators about competencies and skills? We collected data on the draft competencies using surveys, focus groups, and interviews. The iterative revision phase followed the community review phase before finalizing the framework. Here, we report a hierarchical learning framework, with six core competencies, twenty illustrative skills, and companion immunology-specific example learning outcomes. Predominant themes from interviews and focus groups, which informed revisions of this framework are shared. With the growing need for immunology education across the sciences, the ImmunoSkills Guide and accompanying discussion can be used as a resource for educators, administrators and policymakers.